Home » ExchangeEveryDay » Initiative vs. Guilt



ExchangeEveryDay Past Issues


<< Previous Issue | View Past Issues | | Next Issue >> ExchangeEveryDay
Initiative vs. Guilt
March 10, 2015
Only those who will risk going too far can possibly find out how far it is possible to go.
-T.S. Eliot

In his great new book Giants in the Nursery — reviewing the work of the pioneers in our field such as Rousseau, Froebel, Steiner, Montessori, Freud, Piaget, Erikson and Vygotsky — David Elkind summarizes Erik Erikson's views on initiative versus guilt:

"...the child, age three to five, is pretty much master of her body.... The child can thus initiate motor activities of various sorts on her own and no longer merely respond to or imitate the actions of other children. The same holds true of the child's language and fantasy activities. Erikson argues that the social dimension that appears at this stage has initiative at one of its poles and guilt at the other.

"Whether a child will leave this stage with his sense of initiative outbalancing his sense of guilt depends to a considerable extent on how parents respond to the child's self-initiated activities. A child who is given the freedom and the opportunity to initiate motor play... has his sense of initiative reinforced. Initiative is also reinforced when parents answer the child's questions and do not deride or inhibit fantasy or play activity.

"On the other hand, if a child is made to feel that her motor activity is always noisy and disruptive, that posing questions is a nuisance, and that her play is silly and stupid, then she may develop a sense of guilt over self-initiated activities that will persist through later life stages."





Giants in the Nursery: A Biographical History of Developmentally Appropriate Practice

Examine the evolution of developmentally appropriate practice with this biographical history of early childhood education.  This book explores the theory's progression — from its beginnings in writings of Giants in the Nurserysixteenth- and seventeenth-century philosophers, its experimental implementation by eighteenth- and nineteenth-century practitioners, and its scientific grounding in contemporary theory and research — and includes biographical sketches and perspectives of eleven philosophical, pedagogical, and theoretical figures — the giants — in this evolution.

Learn More and Order!

 

ExchangeEveryDay

Delivered five days a week containing news, success stories, solutions, trend reports, and much more.

What is ExchangeEveryDay?

ExchangeEveryDay is the official electronic newsletter for Exchange Press. It is delivered five days a week containing news stories, success stories, solutions, trend reports, and much more.

Formative Assessment - FREE 90-day Full Trial
Scholastic, Big Day, Ensure Kindergarten readiness by building a foundation for success.
Monsam Portable Sinks


Comments (1)

Displaying 1 Comment
Francis Wardle · March 10, 2015
Center for the Study of Biracial Children (CSBC)
Denver, CO, United States


I look forward to using this book as an important resource. However, I am extremely surprised and very disappointed that John Dewey is omitted from this book. He is the philosophical giant behind the Bank Street approach to early education, the Project Approach and emergent curriculum, and thematic curricula. He is also front and center in the Reggio Emilia philosophy. I would also have liked Jerome Bruner to be included.



Post a Comment

Have an account? to submit your comment.


required

Your e-mail address will not be visible to other website visitors.
required
required
required

Check the box below, to help verify that you are not a bot. Doing so helps prevent automated programs from abusing this form.



Disclaimer: Exchange reserves the right to remove any comments at its discretion or reprint posted comments in other Exchange materials.