Home » ExchangeEveryDay » Evaluating Staff Performance



ExchangeEveryDay Past Issues


<< Previous Issue | View Past Issues | | Next Issue >> ExchangeEveryDay
Evaluating Staff Performance
September 23, 2005
It is something to be able to paint a particular picture, or to carve a statute, and so to make a few objects beautiful; but it is far more glorious to carve and paint the very atmosphere and medium through which we look…To affect the quality of the day—that is the highest of arts.
-Henry David Thoreau

One of our mentors, a person whose advice and support helped us through the early years of publishing Exchange, was Jim Levine.  Before we met him, Jim had been a center director in Worcester, Massachusetts.  He wrote a series of letters to his predecessor giving advice on being a director.  In one of these letters he shared the following ideas on using evaluation to help staff prove their performance.  Here are a few of these ideas:

• Staff must understand that the program is premised on the belief that not only children but also adults continue to grow; evaluation as a regular feature of the program is a tool for such growth.

• Everyone should understand that evaluation is a two-way process.  The director must be open to criticism, for staff will only accept criticism if they see the director is doing so.

• Directness in criticism is a virtue.  Everything else muddles issues.  Our cliche -- simple and direct -- makes it sound as if directness is easy to come by.  This is not so.  It is often much easier to be vague and indirect, for fear of hurting feelings.

• Evaluation is often difficult because one's criticism can imply so much more than a judgment about the carrying out of specific job responsibilities.  Few human relations jobs allow us to separate job tasks from personality: criticism often conveys -- or is received as -- judgment of personal worth.  While you must evaluate in terms of specific job functions, your criticism will more likely be received constructively if you are able to communicate a desire to see beyond the job, to understand your staff members' skills or potential skills in other settings.

• The preconditions for constructive evaluation is trust.  In the classroom we strive to communicate our support of the child as a growing person, even if we don't sanction all of the child's actions.  Should the goals or standards we set for ourselves be any less than those we set for our children?  Staff can only be evaluated constructively if they feel supported as individuals, as persons whose talents may or may not be appropriate for the child care center, and as persons who are being given the chance to test the talents peculiar to working in a child care center and not to their personhood.

ExchangeEveryDay

Delivered five days a week containing news, success stories, solutions, trend reports, and much more.

What is ExchangeEveryDay?

ExchangeEveryDay is the official electronic newsletter for Exchange Press. It is delivered five days a week containing news stories, success stories, solutions, trend reports, and much more.

The full text of the Levine’s Exchange article, “Letters to a Child Care Director:  Insights on Being a Director,” is available on our web site.





Post a Comment

Have an account? to submit your comment.


required

Your e-mail address will not be visible to other website visitors.
required
required
required

Check the box below, to help verify that you are not a bot. Doing so helps prevent automated programs from abusing this form.



Disclaimer: Exchange reserves the right to remove any comments at its discretion or reprint posted comments in other Exchange materials.