Home » ExchangeEveryDay » Style, Charisma, Power and Politics in Leadership



ExchangeEveryDay Past Issues


<< Previous Issue | View Past Issues | | Next Issue >> ExchangeEveryDay
Style, Charisma, Power and Politics in Leadership
August 29, 2006
Never apologize. Never explain. Just get the thing done, and let them howl.
-Agnes MacPhail

The interplay between style, leadership, charisma, and power is one that has been explored by many authors writing about organizations and politics. All of these factors can play a role in creating an effective institution. Here’s how two political writers analyzed them, and each is relevant to any leader's work.

“Although leadership and the exercise of power are distinguishable activities, they overlap and interweave in important ways. Consider a corporate chief executive officer who has the gift for inspiring and motivating people, who has vision, who lifts the spirits of employees with a resulting rise in productivity and quality of product, and a drop in turnover and absenteeism. That is leadership. But evidence emerges that the company is falling behind in the technology race. One day with the stroke of a pen the CEO increases the funds available to the research division. That is the exercise of power. The stroke of a pen could have been made by an executive with none of the qualities one associates with leadership.”

John W. Gardner, U.S. political activist, statesman. On Leadership, ch. 6, Free Press (1990).

We can also learn from another perspective that shows the effectiveness of contrasting approaches to leadership:

“The leadership qualities of Franklin Roosevelt and Dwight Eisenhower deserve special scrutiny because their common and contrasting qualities illumine the nature of “charismatic” leadership in the Presidency. James M. Burns, by calling his study of Roosevelt "The Lion and the Fox," placed him in the tradition of Machiavellian strategy, and there is little question that Roosevelt used imaginative daring and pugnacity along with the cunning maneuver. Both qualities led him deep into party politics, where he fought the unfaithful ... and smote the heathen without. Eisenhower had less both of the lion and the fox; he was not savage in attack, but usually soft-spoken; and he affected the style of staying outside political involvement and keeping above the party battles.... He understood the deep American impulse toward the belittling of politics, and by seeming to avoid partisanship he could win more converts to his cause than the most partisan leader.”

Max Lerner (1902�"1992), Russian-born U.S. author, columnist. America as a Civilization, pt. 6, ch. 3, Simon & Schuster (1957).

Contributed by Joel Gordon

ExchangeEveryDay

Delivered five days a week containing news, success stories, solutions, trend reports, and much more.

What is ExchangeEveryDay?

ExchangeEveryDay is the official electronic newsletter for Exchange Press. It is delivered five days a week containing news stories, success stories, solutions, trend reports, and much more.

Want to limit your liability and provide the safest transportation for your children? The Kidette is your solution for childcare transportation! Click here.


Comments (2)

Displaying All 2 Comments
Hope Moffatt · August 29, 2006
Ft. McMurray, Alberta, United States


Your beginning quote is falsely attributed to Agnes McPhail. In fact, this powerful quote should be attributed to Nellie McClung - a Canadian woman who was part of the Famous Five and who helped to bring voting rights to women in Canada. Nellie was known for her fiery oratory abilities and her dedication to the cause of women and children.

I'm including a bit about Nellie. Google to find out more about one of Canada's most courageous women:

"In 1927 she joined Emily Murphy, Irene Parlby, Louise McKinney, and Henrietta Edwards for what would become known as "The Person's Case." What was at issue was whether women could be appointed to the Canadian Senate. Canada's constitution, then the British North America Act, stated that one must be a "person" to serve in the Senate, but in 1928 the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that when the BNA Act was written in 1867, the term "person" was not meant to include women, but only men. The women appealed the decision to the Judicial Committee of the British Privy Council, then the highest court for Canadian constitutional interpretation. In October 1929 the Judicial Committee ruled that Canadian women were, in fact, persons and could be appointed to the Senate."

Nellie McClung is one of my personal heroes, and I have this quote right above my computer in my office!

Gwen Morgan · August 29, 2006
Lincoln, MA, United States



I sat up and took notice at the name Joel Gordon. For years I have greatly valued his views on paradigm change. It would be very important at this time to
resurrect some of that thinking. Get Joel Gordon to contribute some Joel Gordon.



Post a Comment

Have an account? to submit your comment.


required

Your e-mail address will not be visible to other website visitors.
required
required
required

Check the box below, to help verify that you are not a bot. Doing so helps prevent automated programs from abusing this form.



Disclaimer: Exchange reserves the right to remove any comments at its discretion or reprint posted comments in other Exchange materials.