Home » ExchangeEveryDay » Pre-K in Kazakhstan



ExchangeEveryDay Past Issues


<< Previous Issue | View Past Issues | | Next Issue >> ExchangeEveryDay
Pre-K in Kazakhstan
December 19, 2006
Three Rules of Work: Out of clutter find simplicity; From discord find harmony; In the middle of difficulty lies opportunity.
-Albert Einstein

In the popular movie, Borat, Kazakhstan comes in for pretty shabby treatment. A more evenhanded look at Kazakhstan can be found in the UNESCO Policy Brief on Early Childhood (“Ensuring Equitable Access to Preschool Education: Kazakhstan’s Experience”; July-August 2005).

The paper points out that early childhood education has undergone significant ups and downs in the recent past. Before the fall of the Soviet empire, all children in Kazakhstan, regardless of their regional and social backgrounds, had universal access to state preschool services. But after the Soviet collapse, many preschool organizations were closed; programs in the rural areas, where 51% of preschool children reside, were particularly hard hit.

To mitigate the collapse of preschool education, the Kazak government, in 1999, made one year of pre-primary education free and compulsory. [This was even before many U.S. states implemented sweeping Pre-K systems!] The policy has been effective. The enrolment rate of 5- and 6-year olds in pre-primary education grew steadily from 45% in 2000 to 51% in 2003. But a close examination of enrolment patterns reveals that children in rural areas are most likely attending half-day programs while their urban counterparts participate predominantly in full-day programs. In addition, participation of children in rural areas in all other forms of preschool education is lagging that of children in urban areas.

The paper concludes, “Supporting the development and education of disadvantaged children is a challenge for many governments. Often, with few resources available, not many options are available. While low-cost alternative services can be a useful strategy, they can fail to bridge the quality gap, especially in regard to a smooth transition …within different stages of early childhood.”

ExchangeEveryDay

Delivered five days a week containing news, success stories, solutions, trend reports, and much more.

What is ExchangeEveryDay?

ExchangeEveryDay is the official electronic newsletter for Exchange Press. It is delivered five days a week containing news stories, success stories, solutions, trend reports, and much more.

Leadership On Sale!

This week only, you can purchase Exchange's best-selling managment guide, The Art of Leadership for 20% off.  The manual for operating an early childhood program contains articles by over 70 natinoally-respected early childhood experts including, Lilian Katz, Jim Greenman, Elizabeth Jones. Julie Wassom, Anne Mitchell, Margie Carter, Roger Neugebauer, Thomas Moore, Kay Albrecht, Janet Gonzalez-Mena, Bonnie Neugebauer, Pam Schiller, and Chip Donohue. Learn more about this guidebook here



Comments (4)

Displaying All 4 Comments
Edgar Klugman · December 19, 2006
Playing for Keeps
Newtonville, MA, United States


Dear Bonnie and Roger,
I just want you to know how much I appreciate receiving your daily Exchange Newsletter.

Relating the Borat, Kazahhstan, to what our colleagues in that part of the world are facing,provides an additional perspective to what was featured as a comedy film.

Thank you for continuing to expand our "life space."

Rebecca Candra · December 19, 2006
United States


I also agree with the above remarks. I am still concerned about our assumption that UPK will provide
QUALITY early childhood experiences for our youngest--- I envision the children in state run Kazakastan sitting at desks working on worksheets.

Janet Gonzalez-Mena · December 19, 2006
Fairfield, CA, United States


I agree with Brenda and I'm wondering why we should feel bad that rural children only have half day programs. Is that really falling behind? And what kinds of programs is this article thinking of? Academic preschool?

Brenda Thomas · December 19, 2006
United States


I'm not sure that I agree with some of the assumptions the article makes. Simply because a child is reared in a rural environment does not necessarily mean that the child is disadvantaged. Nor does a full day program give a child more advantages than a half day program. Both depend on the quality of the family situtation and the program in which the child is involved. We should not make decisions based on suppositions, but rather on fact.



Post a Comment

Have an account? to submit your comment.


required

Your e-mail address will not be visible to other website visitors.
required
required
required

Check the box below, to help verify that you are not a bot. Doing so helps prevent automated programs from abusing this form.



Disclaimer: Exchange reserves the right to remove any comments at its discretion or reprint posted comments in other Exchange materials.