Home » ExchangeEveryDay » Is Pre-K the Way?



ExchangeEveryDay Past Issues


<< Previous Issue | View Past Issues | | Next Issue >> ExchangeEveryDay
Is Pre-K the Way?
June 12, 2007
Achievement is made using the faith of optimism.
-Helen Keller

Pre-K programs have become the hottest ticket in early childhood in the past decade. Today, all but eleven states are in some stage of implementing publicly supported services for four year olds. During this time, "competition from the public schools" has consistently been rated by center directors in Exchange surveys as the biggest threat faced by their organizations.

On the plus side, this movement has infused billions of dollars into the early childhood community. On the minus side, in states where planning has not involved all the players, Pre-K programs run in public schools end up, as feared by directors, competing with existing community programs.

In her Exchange article (which can be viewed in its entirety, "Trends in Early Care and Education," Gwen Morgan in looking at Pre-K initiatives across the country asked advocates in each state to consider: "Is the state changing its programs into an organized system? Or is the pre-kindergarten expansion simply adding one more “program” to an unconnected non-system?"

I recently visited Oklahoma, which many have rightly lauded for their progressive steps in improving early care and education. Its "STARS" licensing systems led the way in recognizing levels of quality child care and implementing a tiered set of standards. The state has supported this with significant training efforts to support directors' efforts to enhance quality. At the same time it has enacted a universal Pre-K program that enjoys the highest level of participation (70%) of Pre-K programs. Unfortunately, despite the intent of planners, the Department of Education has directed the vast majority of Pre-K funds to programs operating in the public schools, causing considerable distress for community centers across the state.

Exchange is interested to learn how Pre-K programs are playing out in real life in your states. Are they enhancing the strength and quality of the overall early childhood delivery system, or undermining it? To share your experiences for an upcoming Exchange article, scroll down and click on the "Comment on this article" link. We appreciate your input!

ExchangeEveryDay

Delivered five days a week containing news, success stories, solutions, trend reports, and much more.

What is ExchangeEveryDay?

ExchangeEveryDay is the official electronic newsletter for Exchange Press. It is delivered five days a week containing news stories, success stories, solutions, trend reports, and much more.

“We wanted child care software that handles all our information, is easy to learn and flexible to keep up as we grew. EZ-CARE2 has exceeded all of these expectations.”
Wendy Baker, Goodyear Early Childhood Center

This is just one of the many reasons to try EZ-CARE2 center management! Try a free trial version!



Comments (43)

Displaying 5 of 43 Comments   [ View all ]
Dana Capers · September 06, 2007
Westchase Methodist
Houston, Texas, United States


Has anyone thought about what will happen to the lives of our youngest (infants/toddlers) children when quality programs have to close because of low Pre-Kindergarten enrollment? My school is a non-profit, faith-based program and rely on preschool and pre-kindergarten enrollment to subsidize our infant and toddler classes. Adding more infant and toddler classes won't help because of the small group size and low teacher/child ratios. If we lose our pre-kindergarten classes, we will probably have to close the school. I know that we aren't alone and I wonder what parents will do if they can't find quality infant/toddler care? Unfortunantly, in the state of Texas the minimum standard for teacher/child ratios for infants (2/10) and toddlers (range from 1/9 to 1/13) are not developmentally appropriate. If programs such as mine are forced to close down, then the major alternative for parents is to find a daycare center that operates with the minimum standard teacher/child ratios. What a sad shame this will be for the very age we proport is the most important time in a child's development. Isn't this a tad bit hypocritical? In some states there seems to be more of a collaborative effort among the public and private school sectors than in Texas, where there is a lot of "talk" but not much action.

Karen · July 19, 2007
Rockwall, Texas, United States


We just moved to Texas from California and were thrilled that there was a public Pre-K program. The teachers are credentialed (as compared to some preschools where teachers are only required to have taken a few early childhood classes) and the curriculum has nicely prepared our daughter for public school Kindergarten. The children were introduced to letters, sounds and numbers and the majority of the 3-hour day was spent on hands-on, developmental activities. The children were not expected to have mastered any of the skills taught, it was just for exposure. Our daughter attended school 5 days a week for 3 hours which has been an excellent transition into full day Kindergarten. The tuition was extremely reasonable for the quality of education received and our state offers an income-based, all day Pre-K program as well. I have taught Kindergarten for the past 8 years and am taking a break to be home with my children. As an educator and parent, I was extremely pleased with our state's Pre-K program and am highly recommending it to anyone who asks.

Karen Kerr · July 13, 2007
The Family Center
Miami, Florida, United States


I am horrified that the state is testing children on letter and sound recognition skills to determine if their Pre-K program prepared them for kindergarten. I have been in this field for 40 years. It took at least 35 of them to convince parents that those skills are not preparing children to think, create or problem solve. If children do not have these thinking skills, however, knowing the names of letters will not make them "ready" for kindergarten.
My 4 year old enrollment has steadily dropped since the state began offering Pre-K. Parents are encouraged to send their children to the public schools when they apply for eligibility.

Jacqueline · June 29, 2007
Professional Learning Centetr of Boynton Beach
Boynton Beach, Florida, United States


3 hr. VPK program did not touch the socio-economic class that it was hoping to assist. These three hour only children are from households where mom stays home and never would have sent their 4 year old to school unless this credit was in place. The other children that attend (low income areas) drop out of the program due to lack of transportation or support leaving the schools with no income in those projected spaces. This program needs to increase to at least six hours per day, even yet, 8 hours per day before it will be effective. The test results for Florida from the 2005 classes is not very promising; with the lowest grades being earned by many "Pulbic school based programs". If you failed that year, the information was not given to you in time to avoid failure in your program for the second year, so technically you should not be allowed to run a third year program. I have had six VPK classrooms in the past two years; due to increase in schools providing this service, and less children looking for placements, I'm cutting back to four classrooms. I hope Tallahassee decides to interview people in my position to hear the real pros and cons of this program. I've been in the industry for 41 years and have seen it all.

Dave Linsmeier · June 27, 2007
United States


In the state of Wisconsin the funding for 4 year old kindergarten comes through the public schools. The funding is for a 2 1/2 hour program. 62% of the school districts are offering 4K. Of those offering 4K, 19% are partnering with child care and head start agencies to provide 4K.

Our agency is partnering with 2 different school districts to provide a quality 4K for families. We can offer full day services for families who need more than a 2 1/2 hour program. Children are not bussed from one program to another. We receive reimbursement from the school districts that covers all of our costs. Sharing resources with the school districts has been great for our program, the school districts and the families we serve.

We also operate child care programs in school districts who are not partnering with head start and child care. We have seen a significant reduction in our enrollments and it has impacted us detrimentally.



Post a Comment

Have an account? to submit your comment.


required

Your e-mail address will not be visible to other website visitors.
required
required
required

Check the box below, to help verify that you are not a bot. Doing so helps prevent automated programs from abusing this form.



Disclaimer: Exchange reserves the right to remove any comments at its discretion or reprint posted comments in other Exchange materials.