Home » ExchangeEveryDay » The Case for Integration



ExchangeEveryDay Past Issues


<< Previous Issue | View Past Issues | | Next Issue >> ExchangeEveryDay
The Case for Integration
July 30, 2007
One word frees us of all the weight and pain of life. That word is love.
-Sophocles
Preschool Matters (July, 2007; www.nieer.org) reported encouraging results from a Connecticut study of the impact of integrated preschool classrooms. The study followed 274 children from low- and middle-income families. Some of the children were in integrated high-quality pre-K classrooms and some in high quality programs serving only children from low-income families. Children from low-income families who attended the integrated programs achieved an average of seven points higher on the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test than did the children in the segregated programs. As a result, the children from low-income families in the integrated programs moved from below the national norm in the fall to just above it in the spring. When results were compared by language spoken, the difference was even greater: children from low-income families who spoke English as their primary language and attended the integrated program gained an average of 10 points on the Peabody Test, putting their gains in the same league with their middle-income classmates.

Editor's Note: It is not our practice to insert our views in ExchangeEveryDay, but this time we can't resist. While these findings are very interesting, one can't help but wonder what the results of integration were for the children from middle-income families. Hopefully the goals of classroom integration are not so narrow (nor so arrogant) as to focus solely in the impact on one segment of the population. Clearly this was beyond the scope of the study, but provides opportunities for further research and consideration.



Looking for a Great Job?

Currently, the Exchange Job Opportunities service offers a variety of early childhood positions in Minnesota, Florida, Texas, North Carolina, Washington, DC, and Puerto Rico. Check out Exchange's Job Opportunities!

ExchangeEveryDay

Delivered five days a week containing news, success stories, solutions, trend reports, and much more.

What is ExchangeEveryDay?

ExchangeEveryDay is the official electronic newsletter for Exchange Press. It is delivered five days a week containing news stories, success stories, solutions, trend reports, and much more.

Motivate Teachers
FREE registration today! Gain support, information and inspiration about the new NAEYC Accreditation standards as Julie Bartkus hosts a conference call with the NAEYC Academy for Early Childhood Program Accreditation.


Comments (9)

Displaying 5 of 9 Comments   [ View all ]
Kay · August 01, 2007
Malibu, Ca, United States


What were the gains made by the low income children in the segregated groups that came from homes where English was spoken? Without that information how can we assume the gains made were not because of the primary language spoken in the home?

Beth Bye · July 31, 2007
CREC
Hartford, CT, United States


As one of the authors of this study -- of course we were focused on all students... as were all the programs. Not really sure what the point of the editor's comment is.

Middle income students made larger gains that expected as well -- but not as large as the low income students in economically integrated setting. Thus to gap was being closed -- at a much faster rate than for students in all low income settings (whose gains were very slight). At least in CT, the vast majority of public $$ goes to economically isolated low income programs. This study suggestes that we need to look at our public policy to incentivise more mixed income settings for children.
Given what we know about the importance of vocabulary and the huge advantages that upper middle class children have in this skill set entering preschool -- this study shows that lower income students can make up some of the ground on vocabulary in just on year of preschool. And if the program is economically integrated -- make up is more likely and to a greater degree.

Julie Culhane · July 31, 2007
United States


What jumped out for me was the out-dated term "integrated". Programs that are open to children with and without identified special needs are "inclusion" programs.

Out with the old, and in with the new. And not just because it's politically correct! The language we use has the power to educate, change attitudes, and reflect how mandates translate into everyday practice that's better for children, families & communities.

Cherida Gr · July 30, 2007
Oakland, CA, United States


I too want to know how ALL children faired not only on the test but socially and academically as well.

Beverlyn · July 30, 2007
United States



I agree with the Editor's Notes. Most research done on preschool children focuses on the under achieving children who are from low income areas. This viewpoint creates the tunnel vision that all low income children are "at risk". Educators want to know how all young children are developing in all areas, especially in social development. Children come from a plethora of diverse situations. In order to stamp out the"isms" tolerance building in an integated setting is an important reality.



Post a Comment

Have an account? to submit your comment.


required

Your e-mail address will not be visible to other website visitors.
required
required
required

Check the box below, to help verify that you are not a bot. Doing so helps prevent automated programs from abusing this form.



Disclaimer: Exchange reserves the right to remove any comments at its discretion or reprint posted comments in other Exchange materials.