Home » ExchangeEveryDay » Is Testing Preschoolers a Good Idea?



ExchangeEveryDay Past Issues


<< Previous Issue | View Past Issues | | Next Issue >> ExchangeEveryDay
Is Testing Preschoolers a Good Idea?
March 4, 2015
Where there is great love there are always miracles.
-Willa Cather

The most controversial ExchangeEveryDay in 2006 was published on November 17 in response to a Washington Post article, "The Rise of the Testing Culture: As Exam-Takers Get Younger, Some Say Value Is Overblown," which raised some interesting issues about testing (and stimulated 35 comments):

"Along with painting and gluing and coloring and playing, Kisha Lee engages the youngsters in her day-care program in another activity: testing. Three- and four-year-olds take spelling tests of such words as I, me, and the, as well as math tests, from which they learn how to fill in a bubble to mark the right answer. Test preparation for children barely out of diapers is hardly something Lee learned while getting her education degree at the University of Maryland, she said. But it is what she says she must do - for the kids' sakes - based on her past experience teaching in a Prince George's County elementary school.

"'Kids get tested and labeled as soon as they get into kindergarten,' said Lee, who runs the state-certified Alternative Preschool Solutions in Accokeek. 'They have to pass a standardized test from the second they get in. I saw kindergartners who weren't used to taking a test, and they fell apart, crying, saying they couldn't do it. The child who can sit and answer the questions correctly is identified as talented,' Lee said. 'It hurts me to have to do this, but it hurts the kids if I don't.'

"Lee's approach underscores the culture of testing that reigns in the United States. Americans like tests so much that they have structured society around them. Newborns are greeted into the world with the Apgar test to measure activity, pulse, reflex, appearance, and respiration. Getting a 3 or below is like getting an F. Soon to follow are assessments - the first of many- that will compare them with their peers. Are they crawling, sitting, walking at the correct age? In no time, kids are facing tests to measure school readiness. Four-year-olds are tested in literacy and math in Head Start programs, and kindergartners undergo tests to see who is 'gifted.' By then, they are firmly ensconced on the testing treadmill."





Teaching Four-Year-Olds:
A Personal Journey

Use coupon code FOUR
to save 20% on Teaching Four-Year-Olds

What does every young child need to be a well-adjusted, happy person? From Carol Hillman's years of experience and wisdom comes the answer: Help each child discover a world where play, creative freedom, self trust, and personal responsibility open the child's mind and heart to the excitement of learning and the enjoyment of sharing it with others.

Enter coupon code "FOUR" when at checkout.

Offer valid through June 9, 2020 at 11:59 pm Pacific Time.
May not be combined with any other offer.

ExchangeEveryDay

Delivered five days a week containing news, success stories, solutions, trend reports, and much more.

What is ExchangeEveryDay?

ExchangeEveryDay is the official electronic newsletter for Exchange Press. It is delivered five days a week containing news stories, success stories, solutions, trend reports, and much more.

Softerware, Make Managing Your Childcare Center Easier.
Rocky Mountain Sunscreen - Buy Bulk and Save!
Learn about the updates and changes to the new edition of the best-selling social-emotional screener ASQ:SE!


Comments (15)

Displaying All 15 Comments
barbara Burton · July 09, 2015
nc, United States


the article was right on target. How did we get to this place? I have been in early ed
for over 50 years and I am very very sad about what is happening to young children!!!

Kim Burns · March 06, 2015
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada


I must agree with what Lori has said in her comments. We learn about what children are capable of and what they already know by having quality interactions with them NOT by testing them. I am shocked with what I read in this Exchange news brief. All Early Childhood professionals know that children learn best by following their lead in play.

Alma · March 06, 2015
ACSB
Gainesville, FL, United States


The idea is not testing preschoolers but incorporating authentic assessment for all early childhood learners, which includes up the eight years of age.

Nancy · March 05, 2015
United States


this is so inappropriate. If this is what Early Childhood education is now I am glad I have retired.

Nancy · March 04, 2015
United States


I was not happy to read about young children taking this type of test. Please let four year olds be four!!
If this is how it is now in Early Childhood education, I am glad I am retired from the field

Peter Luke Gebhardt · March 04, 2015
Aor International
Dallas, TX, United States


Testing young children is "flat-out" developmentally inappropriate. Taking anecdotal notes on what the children do and say is appropriate monitoring of their progress, and then using accepted developmental guidelines to facilitate understanding of the observations is an effective method. The High/Scope Foundation publishes the C.O.R. Early Childhood Assessment Tool, which is a developmentally-appropriate method used to monitor children's progress. It works well, and should be adopted everywhere! The testing Company's are greedy and want schools' money, regardless how developmentally-inappropriate their testing is. Early childhood educators need to stand up for children's rights not to be tested.

Rick Porter · March 04, 2015
Rainbow River CDC
Hermosa Beach, Ca., United States


The Universal Preschool Act is the leader in this charge to test. The Los Angeles Universal Preschool project has hundreds of preschools under it's wing that requires mandatory testing and teach to testing. We were a part of the project for 6 years and were pushed out because we objected to all the "experts", "reading and math specialists", "special university produced curriculum" all to give us "improved" test scores and provide "kindergarten readiness" and proof to funding agencies and Boards of "measurable " results.

Pat Rackliffe · March 04, 2015
Westport Weston Cooperative Nursery School
Westport, CT, United States


This article is so disturbing to me. There is research on the many NYC kindergarteners, whose parents pay dearly for tutors in order to have their children identified as "gifted." By third grade, a great number of these children are re- identified as typical. Drilling young children robs them of their childhood and the results are inaccurate: smoke and mirrors.

Lori · March 04, 2015
St. James Nursery School
Elkins Park, Pennsylvania, United States


My classroom in a bustling, happy place where the children on any day are involved in dramatic play, building towers (and knocking them down), creating cards and pictures for family and friends, talking (and arguing) with classmates, listening to stories--the classroom is alive. The children love to talk with the teachers about what they are doing or what's on their mind. They look to us when they can't solve a problem, whether it be a puzzle or a social situation. They know they can trust the teacher's guidance. I do not support the idea of testing, as Nancy said--I know what my children can do from the interactions we have. They are constantly evolving and growing. Letters, numbers, colors are around us everyday and part of our normal conversation. I do not even like the term 'curriculum' in the early childhood world. Learning is so natural for children--until we make it unnatural with our inappropriate expectations --worksheets and testing. These are the years when school should be a joy to attend. There are already natural stressful situations for the children to deal with at school: separating from a parent, challenging social-emotional situations with peers, learning patience and empathy---this is where our focus needs to be. We need to stand up for childhood!

Barbara · March 04, 2015
Community Presbyterian PreKindergarten
Atlantic Beach, FL, United States


Pushing children to do things before they are ready doesn't prepare them, it hurts them. The developmental timeline along which children grow and develop has not changed, but we persist in asking them to achieve milestones for which they are not physically, cognitively, and/or socially mature enough. Our efforts are misguided, doing harm in the long run. "The prime purpose of being FOUR* is to enjoy being FOUR." Jim Trelease *or any preschool age-my comment

Francis Wardle · March 04, 2015
Center for the Study of Biracial Children (CSBC)
Denver, CO, United States


No wonder people are confused about tests, assessments, and accountability! This article confuses three distinctly different kinds of assessments. The Apgar test is a critical tool used in hospitals to assess the health of infants and to allow doctors to immediately address important and sometimes life-threatening medical needs; assessments for giftedness (and various developmental delays) are used to make sure programs match the unique developmental needs of all students; and using academic tests on young children is simply a push-down of the assembly line approach of American education. Let's be clear on what we are talking about before we deconstruct it! Preparing young children to fill in test bubbles because they will need to do this in later grades is like teaching a 5-year- old how to drive a car because as an adult he/she will need to learn to drive!

Jan Carman · March 04, 2015
Omaha, NE, United States


I am a retired educator. I have over 35 years in education. I taught the first all day every day Kindergarten in the state of Nebraska.
This article makes me so angry and sad. We as teachers of the very young need to fight this ridiculous idea that testing is okay. I cannot believe that we are saying oh well...it's what we must do, because we are told by those who have little to no experience with teaching children. The research is clear. The results have little long term effects on life long learning.
My classroom was filled with a variety of thoughtful learning centers that allowed children of all abilities and experiences to discover, play, and use language. I worked with teachers who believed and still believe this is how we teach young children. We asked purposeful questions and had conversations with each child. We observed and made careful assessments regarding their growth. Let's get back to the real reason we love young children! Stop testing!

Cori · March 04, 2015
Indianapolis, IN, United States


Please stop testing preschoolers and let them be children. As preschool teachers we need to do what is developmentally appropriate for our children and testing is not. Children need to investigate and be problem solvers and sitting them down for tests will only harm their ability to grow into critical thinkers. Just because Kindergarten through third is completely developmentally inappropriate does not mean we need to follow in their foot-steps. What we should be doing is fighting to change the way K-3 is taught and looked at in and outside the education world. We need to encourage children to be problem solvers and right now our children are losing creativity and critical thinking skills due to our inappropriate practices. We need to fight against testing and teach our children the way we know is best. Policies are made by too many people that are not in the classroom and have no idea how child development works. They just see numbers. We need to make them see through the eyes of educators, not politicians, so they start seeing children instead.

Nancy Gagnon · March 04, 2015
New Hampshire, United States


I am surprised to read that Head Start "tests". They are supposed to be so "developmental". Let's get back to what children need--lots of social experiences, gross motor and fine motor play opportunities, time to play outside, music, dance, interactions with peers and caring adults. The learning will come within these times. Lots of good literature--reading, puppet play, time to pretend play, opportunities to explore their indoor and outdoor environment.....and did I say play? I do believe that the adults can monitor and note progress without "testing"--we have been doing it for years. I knew my class and children quite well and would sit with them regularly and be sure that their "preschool" skills were on target without a "standardized" test--could they cut out the circle for the snowman we were making at art time? Could they identify the colors of the paint we were using for the project today? Could they write their name and identify the letters? I did not need a standardized test every 3 months to suck up my class time with the children.

Mary Horsley · March 04, 2015
Richmond Public Schools
Henrico, Va, United States


Too much and definitely not developmentally appropriate! We need education revolution in this country.



Post a Comment

Have an account? to submit your comment.


required

Your e-mail address will not be visible to other website visitors.
required
required
required

Check the box below, to help verify that you are not a bot. Doing so helps prevent automated programs from abusing this form.



Disclaimer: Exchange reserves the right to remove any comments at its discretion or reprint posted comments in other Exchange materials.