Home » ExchangeEveryDay » Early Childhood Programs Lagging in Rural Areas



ExchangeEveryDay Past Issues


<< Previous Issue | View Past Issues | | Next Issue >> ExchangeEveryDay
Early Childhood Programs Lagging in Rural Areas
October 20, 2006
If we value the pursuit of knowledge, we must be free to follow wherever that search may lead us. The free mind is not a barking dog, to be tethered on a ten-foot chain.
-Adlai E. Stevenson, Jr.
A new study paints a troubling picture of rural America, where programs and children are few and far between.  The study, conducted by the National Center for Rural Early Childhood Learning Initiatives, and reported in Preschool Matters (August 2006; www.nieer.org), found that rural children lag far behind their non-rural peers in key literacy skills.  Specifically, they are...
  • Far less likely to recognize letters
  • Far less familiar with the beginning sounds of words
  • Far less familiar with books and reading.

As, a result, the study's authors conclude, rural children are far more likely to land in special education classes in kindergarten than children growing up in cities or suburbs.  The consequences for African-American children in rural communities are particularly severe �" only 54% were proficient in letter recognition when they entered kindergarten.  The new data also reveal that Native American and Alaskan native children are at severe risk of school failure.

ExchangeEveryDay

Delivered five days a week containing news, success stories, solutions, trend reports, and much more.

What is ExchangeEveryDay?

ExchangeEveryDay is the official electronic newsletter for Exchange Press. It is delivered five days a week containing news stories, success stories, solutions, trend reports, and much more.

Safety is only a few steps and a push button away; the Child Check-Mate System never sleeps so you can rest assured, included on every Corbeil Kidette. Click here to learn more.


Comments (5)

Displaying All 5 Comments
Deborah DeSimone · October 23, 2006
Los Alamos, NM, United States


Hooray for the previous comments! I too am very concerned about the way society is heading with regard to education. Children in cities or rural areas shouldn't need to recognize letters or be starting to read at age 5! They should be playing and be involved in quality interactions with caring adults and children. Academic success will come when children are ready - not before - and it's ok. Sooner and faster is not usually better. This is a very valid reason many parents today, including myself (a former educator), are considering homeschooling their children and keeping them out of the rat race in the school systems.

Connie Nelson · October 21, 2006
Constance Care
Plentywood, Montana, United States


AMEN to Janet's reply!!! The schools' purpose is to teach---not reject children because they don't meet the teacher's expectations. I take offense to these comments from the study because I have a center located in a rural area and I am very proud of the quality care we provide to the community. Granted, programs are far between . However, we in the rural area are able to provide appropriate Early Childhood Education to these children.

Connie Nelson

Janet Gonzalez-Mena · October 20, 2006
Fairfield, CA, United States


I haven't read the study, so maybe I shouldn't comment but... I think our field is headed in the wrong direction when studies seem to point to lack of academics in the early years as the main problem that puts kids behind in school or sends them to special ed. It sounds as if we just teach preschoolers beginning sounds and letter recognition that would do it. But we ECE folks know it isn't that simple. There are always lots of other factors going on. In my generation nobody taught us that stuff before school and the patterns were the same then as now - middle class kids of educated parents did better in school than poor kids. Rural or urban, that's the way it worked then. Things may be changing slowly, but I just can't buy the story that it's simplistic approaches to early literacy that does it. That's the cheap solution and I think we'll find eventually that it doesn't work. There are loads of social issues that enter the picture - inequities in health care, nutrition. Poverty. Exhausted working parents, some of whom work two jobs to make ends meet. Not to mention violence in young children's lives. Drugs, alcohol - it goes on and on. We all know the stories. When is this society going to sit up and look at the really big changes that need to be made if all children are to succeed in school? And when are schools going to be ready for children instead of demanding that children be ready for them?

Judy Metzger · October 20, 2006
Campus and Community CHildren's Center
Fredonia, NY, United States


I am concerned that alphabet recognition is the factor used to decide if children are at risk for learning problems.
I would ask if rural children are more physically fit and better problem solvers even if they can't identify letters. Please let's be careful!

gwen Morgan · October 20, 2006
Wheelock College
Lincoln, NA, United States


I wish I knew more about the study's sources of data. There are some Resource and Referral Agencies in rural areas that have a lot of information on what is available in rural areas.



Post a Comment

Have an account? to submit your comment.


required

Your e-mail address will not be visible to other website visitors.
required
required
required

Check the box below, to help verify that you are not a bot. Doing so helps prevent automated programs from abusing this form.



Disclaimer: Exchange reserves the right to remove any comments at its discretion or reprint posted comments in other Exchange materials.