Home » ExchangeEveryDay » Breastfeedng Saves Lives



ExchangeEveryDay Past Issues


<< Previous Issue | View Past Issues | | Next Issue >> ExchangeEveryDay
Breastfeedng Saves Lives
April 7, 2010
To live a creative life, we must lose our fear of being wrong.
-Joseph Chilton Pearce, 1926 - 2016, American author

"If most new moms would breastfeed their babies for the first six months of life, it would save nearly 1,000 lives and billions of dollars each year."

As we celebrate World Health Day today, we should be reminded about the importance of breastfeeding by this new study published in the Journal of Pediatrics.  This report further observed...

"The United States incurs $13 billion in excess costs annually and suffers 911 preventable deaths per year because our breastfeeding rates fall far below medical recommendations...

"The World Health Organization says infants should be exclusively breastfed for the first six months of life to achieve optimal growth, development and health. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Academy of Family Physicians and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention all agree that breast milk alone is sufficient for newborns and infants until they are 6 months old.

"However, a 2009 breastfeeding report card from the CDC found that only 74 percent of women start breastfeeding, only 33 percent were still exclusively breastfeeding at three months and only 14 percent were still exclusively breastfeeding at six months.

Dr. Melissa Bartick, one of the new study's co-authors, says "...the vast majority of extra costs incurred each year could be saved if 80 to 90 percent of women exclusively breastfed for as little as four months and if 90 percent of women would breastfeed some times until six months. Most of the excess costs are due to premature deaths. Nearly all, 95 percent of these deaths, are attributed to three causes: sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS); necrotizing enterocolitis, seen primarily in preterm babies and in which the lining of the intestinal wall dies; and lower respiratory infections such as pneumonia.  Breastfeeding has been shown to reduce the risk of all of these and seven other illnesses studied."


Understand what is safe, environmentally friendly, and healthy when it comes to products and practices used in your program.  Help make the world a safer, healthier place for young children. The Go Green Rating Scale for Early Childhood Settings is a comprehensive, research-based tool to help you measure the greenness of your setting, evaluate your practices, and take steps toward environmental improvement that will contribute to children's potential for long, healthy lives.  Categories evaluated in the rating scale include:

  • Air quality
  • Cleaning products
  • Chemicals found in soaps, lotions, and sunscreen
  • Pests and pesticides
  • Chemicals found in plastics
  • Lead and other contaminants, such as mercury, formaldehyde, and fire retardants
  • Stewardship and green living, including recycling and waste reduction

ExchangeEveryDay

Delivered five days a week containing news, success stories, solutions, trend reports, and much more.

What is ExchangeEveryDay?

ExchangeEveryDay is the official electronic newsletter for Exchange Press. It is delivered five days a week containing news stories, success stories, solutions, trend reports, and much more.

Are you frustrated by your current childcare software vendor? Discover all the advantages of EZ-CARE2 and save up to 75%! Learn more by visiting:



-6 courses, 18 credits
-meets standards for program accreditation
-graduate & undergraduate degree pathways

 


Comments (6)

Displaying 5 of 6 Comments   [ View all ]
Melissa · April 07, 2010
United States


As a nutrition professional and someone who endorses breastfeeding, the facts are the facts. Lack of breastfeeding a major risk factor for several infant, childhood and even some adult diseases. Studies have proven this! However, I know that breastfeeding takes tons of support from family, friends, the medical community and the community in general. I have read all the research articles and all the data about healthcare cost related to lack of breastfeeding. The public needs to know the facts whether it offends people or not. I do agree that the medical community could do a better job of supporting and promoting breastfeeding but strides have been made.

Leslie · April 07, 2010
United States


I feel as strongly about this as those that have already commented and agree with everything said so far! I fully planned to breastfeed for at least 6 months and made it only 2 months due to multiple issues I was not expecting! I felt terrible guilt that I had to stop, but realized feeding my child in a relaxed atmosphere was more important to his and my well-being than being able to nurse. Before women can nurse exclusively for 6 to 12 months our employers, neighbors, caregivers, family members, co-workers, and the general population need to have a cultural shift and make this world the best place for kids our priority...and we will all reap the benefits!!

Natalie · April 07, 2010
United States


I am a daycare provider and I know that many women have to go back to work after 6-8 weeks and cannot exclusively brest feed of fear that the child may not take a bottle from the provider. I have had this happen and the baby will not eat all day and then the mother is up all night feeding. Many of my parents will however pump for 3-12 months. With so many women in the working force it is unrealistic to me that they could brest feed exclusively for 6 months.

Beth Menninga · April 07, 2010
United States


I agree with Marie. Thoughtful framing of this issue is very important to avoid a "blame" scenario where mothers feel yet another sense of guilt and shame for not living up to societal expectations. Almost every mom of an infant I have ever met has expressed feelings of guilt and pressure around breast feeding. Personally, as an adoptive mother, I find this type of article just adds to my feelings that the larger community does not recognize or support me and my realities as a parent. I think there are additional pressures around breastfeeding and working that are part of the larger context as well. Encouraging breast feeding is great- but please do it in a context that is supportive and that acknowledges the realities that mothers face, rather than tying it to deaths that may or may not be causally linked to lack of breast feeding.

Cynthia Pollack · April 07, 2010
Tompkins Hall Nursery and Childcare Center
New York, New York, United States


I applaud this article but unfortunately, the medical profession does not support exclusive nursing. Within the last seven years, every woman I know who has attempted nursing for her new born has been told by a medical professional that her baby was not thriving and needed supplementary formula. Therefore, once the baby was also taking formula from a bottle the moms were no longer successful at nurswing and it was stopped. These mothers were not encouraged or supported and were given wrong information. Had they continued to nurse exclusively the baby would have thrived and the mother and baby would have been in sinc in terms of the mild supply. This information must be circulated! We need medical professionals, including nurse/lactation consultants, who understand this process.



Post a Comment

Have an account? to submit your comment.


required

Your e-mail address will not be visible to other website visitors.
required
required
required

Check the box below, to help verify that you are not a bot. Doing so helps prevent automated programs from abusing this form.



Disclaimer: Exchange reserves the right to remove any comments at its discretion or reprint posted comments in other Exchange materials.