Home » ExchangeEveryDay » Concerns about Pre-K Movement



ExchangeEveryDay Past Issues


<< Previous Issue | View Past Issues | | Next Issue >> ExchangeEveryDay
Concerns about Pre-K Movement
April 14, 2009
Everything in nature invites us constantly to be what we are.
-Gretel Ehrlich, poet
In his book, Standardized Childhood: The Political and Cultural Struggle over Early Education (Palo Alto: Stanford University Press, 2007) Bruce Fuller voices strong concerns about the trend for states to adapt Pre-K initiatives funding through public school systems.  Sociologist Fuller traveled the country to understand the ideologies of childhood and the raw political forces at play. In his book he details how progressives earnestly seek to extend the rigors of public schooling down into the lives of very young children. Fuller then illuminates the stiff resistance from those who hold less trust in government solutions and more faith in nonprofits and local groups in contributing to the upbringing of young children.

Fuller expresses alarm that small circle of “born–again preschool advocates” are forming powerful political alliances with teacher unions and other interests to move young children into school–based programs. seeking to create a more standard, state-run preschool system. For young children already facing the rigors of play dates and harried parents juggling the strains of work and family, Fuller observes, government is moving in to standardize childhood. Child care and early education already form a $54 billion industry nationwide, and the new preschool advocates aim to add yet another layer, proposing that we “leave no toddler behind,” lobbying for state–run systems that would corral all young children into standardized preschools. Traveling to states that are advancing this “brave new world” of child rearing, Fuller also observes that· requiring all preschool teachers to have a four–year bachelor’s degree is well intentioned, but yields no discernible benefits for children and drives away teachers who have sorely needed bilingual skills.

Standardized Childhood
calls for a strong public investment in preschools that remain rooted in neighborhoods and are focused on children who empirically benefit the most—those from low–income families. The government can progressively allocate greater support without running one–size–fits–all preschools. Bruce Fuller powerfully illuminates culturally rooted variations on how young children learn, and challenges political leaders to nurture forms of early education that are responsive to America’s rainbow of families—rather than trying to standardize childhood.



Run a professional development training session with Exchange's popular Out-of-the-Box Training Kits. An article from Exchange magazine serves as the foundation for each Kit and is included as a handout. Each Kit includes step-by-step instructions to prepare, conduct, and evaluate your training session. They are also flexible enough to allow you to include your own ideas and exercises to meet any special needs of your staff.  The 60+ Out-of-the-Box Training Kits provide training opportunities in the following areas:
  • Health and Safety (7 kits)
  • Curriculum Development and Implementation (15 kits)
  • Environments (6 kits)
  • Family Partnerships (5 kits)
  • Professionalism (1 kit)
  • Early Care and Education (8 kits)
  • Infants and Toddlers (3 kits)
  • Observation, Assessment, and Documentation (4 kits)
  • Positive Discipline (12 kits)

ExchangeEveryDay

Delivered five days a week containing news, success stories, solutions, trend reports, and much more.

What is ExchangeEveryDay?

ExchangeEveryDay is the official electronic newsletter for Exchange Press. It is delivered five days a week containing news stories, success stories, solutions, trend reports, and much more.

Dayton University---Strong National Reputation
New ONLINE programs in Early Childhood Leadership and Advocacy
  • Graduate and Undergraduate program options
  • Accepting workshop credits
  • Serving the needs of program leaders, teacher leaders and advocates
  • NCATE Accredited
  • Excellence for traditional campus-based programs



Comments (10)

Displaying 5 of 10 Comments   [ View all ]
Kathy Gilbert · July 22, 2009
United States


I think we need to be careful in jumping to the conclusion Fuller has is facts twisted. I'm reading his book and am finding it fascinating and covers quite a few different ideas and agendas on the UPK movement. The care needs to be taken in assuming we know all the facts and politics. Fuller talks about Rob Reiner's push for universal preschool. You might be surprised by his focus. I strongly suggest reading the book.

Nancy Langdon · April 22, 2009
Austin, Texas, United States


cI am totally and completely opposed to "mandatory" pre-school education. Our state doesn't even have mandatory kindergarten - in the districts that do offer public pre-school education, they offer a 5 day per week program with no part week options. Pre-school children are held to the same attendance policies as the older children. For some children - it's just too much, too soon. Not all children attend child care away from the home, for those that do some are part time programs, some cared away from the home in a child care center setting, some in home settings, some by extended family. WHY are we taking children out of the home "unnecessarily", away from parents, away from the nurturing, loving, "at play" learning environment that is most appropriate at this age, into a structured, stressful setting earlier than necessary? When will our children ever get to be CHILDREN - run free, in a learn thru play environment, in their own time, in their own place?? It's just too much, too soon with long term negative ramifications -in my opinion. Our schools are already struggling for funding for the appropriate age children - and we want to add more programs to fund? Our children are too standardized already - and we want to "standardize" our 3 & 4 year old children's day - even more than they already are for those children who must attend child care center settings?? I would not want this for my children. There are better ways if there are children in need of a better "early education".

Dianne O\'Dwyer · April 19, 2009
ST Brendan\'s Kindergarten
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia


I think 4 year degreee qualified staff are essential to provide leadership to early childhood services. They can effectively argue the case for play based curriculum and fight against the push down curriculum.
Early childhood services associated with schools leads to a greater acceptance of the professional knowledge and expertise of teachers in this area. It also promotes understanding between the two sectors of education. We are not that different.
In Victoria, Australia, some schools are trying a play based curriculum in the early years of school. For more information about this go to www.kathywalkeredcon.com.au

Cindi · April 15, 2009
United States


I agree with Fuller to a point and detest the idea of the "push down" curriculum that may happen if preschools are part of the elementary school experience. However, more often than not, child day care centers are staffed by inexperienced and unqualified teachers who only make minimum wage. When preschools are housed in elementary buildings, two positive things happen.
1) preschool teacher salaries go up and 2) elementary teachers attitudes and views of preschools and what they can accomplish are heightened.

Reza Azarmi · April 14, 2009
City Coollege of San Francisco
San Francisco, United States


Professor Fuller, has twisted the facts in his 2007 book. Progressive advocates of ECE never did ask any public education policy maker, to "adultify" young children with so much early academic pressure. Instead, they have advocated that young children learn through games, play, and fun filled activities in a high quality and relaxed environment.
The Bush's legacy of NCLB did have its toxic effects on early childhood field as well. Indeed, for the first time, NRS(National Reporting System) was forced on Head Start community in the name of Public Accountability. The intent was to discredit the public role, in educating our children, and instead shifting funds to selective banks in charge of public education. Look at the mushrooming of the Charter preschools across the land.

Finally, liberals advocated that providing public funds for preschool would help the economy, because parents need a quality child care for their kids in order to keep their employment. At the same time, the liberals advocated that the preschoolers learn through play, fun, and positive parents teacher guidance.

Conservatives, and their think tanks, like the Hoover Institute at Stanford University, advocated that preschoolers are not learning because teachers are not accountable in preparing preschoolers for kindergarten. Today, every public child care in this country looks like a mini kindergarten. The Conservatives guided the national policy with their reps. either in the White House, or across from it in the halls of Congress, or in the church!!



Post a Comment

Have an account? to submit your comment.


required

Your e-mail address will not be visible to other website visitors.
required
required
required

Check the box below, to help verify that you are not a bot. Doing so helps prevent automated programs from abusing this form.



Disclaimer: Exchange reserves the right to remove any comments at its discretion or reprint posted comments in other Exchange materials.